SPACES FOR CHANGE’s executive director, Ms. Victoria Ibezim-Ohaeri delivered
the lead paper at a workshop exposing the worsening climatic conditions and negative
impacts of the World Bank-financed Chad-Cameroon Oil Pipeline and the West Africa Gas
Pipelines (WAGP) projects. The
workshop, organized by Friends of the Earth Nigeria, Togo, Ghana in partnership
with Friends of the Earth International brought together Friends of the
Earth’s senior legal officers and researchers from Togo, Ghana, Nigeria;
representatives of project-affected communities from Togo, Ghana, and Nigeria;
civil society leaders, concerned environmentalists and the media to explore
strategies for assisting
project-affected countries and communities to assert and defend their economic, social and cultural rights.
Her paper, “Protecting Communities Affected by WB-financed Initiatives through Litigation” developed an advocacy and litigation strategy for engaging the World Bank and its investors whose handling of the project has caused arbitrary land takings, heritage losses, biodiversity, pollution, outbreak of communicable diseases, high unemployment rates, mass eviction, food insecurity, and loss of livelihoods. Litigation option is considered as a major response to the gross social and economic rights violations exposed in the Friends of the Earth International’s recent report, Broken Promises: Gender Impacts of the World Bank-Financed West-African and Chad-Cameroon Pipelines. Jointly owned by Exxon/Mobil, Petronas Malaysia and Chevron, the 6.7- billion-dollar, 650-mile pipeline, which carries crude from the oilfields of land-locked Chad to a shipping facility off Cameroon's coast, was made possible by World Bank loans amounting to 337.6 million dollars.
Extensive research shows how the projects have undermined the rights and livelihoods of entire communities, and placed disproportionate burden on women, young girls, children and the youth. The authors chided the Bank and its investors for “pandering to the patriarchal tendencies of certain communities where their projects – especially resource-extraction projects – are implemented”.
Her paper, “Protecting Communities Affected by WB-financed Initiatives through Litigation” developed an advocacy and litigation strategy for engaging the World Bank and its investors whose handling of the project has caused arbitrary land takings, heritage losses, biodiversity, pollution, outbreak of communicable diseases, high unemployment rates, mass eviction, food insecurity, and loss of livelihoods. Litigation option is considered as a major response to the gross social and economic rights violations exposed in the Friends of the Earth International’s recent report, Broken Promises: Gender Impacts of the World Bank-Financed West-African and Chad-Cameroon Pipelines. Jointly owned by Exxon/Mobil, Petronas Malaysia and Chevron, the 6.7- billion-dollar, 650-mile pipeline, which carries crude from the oilfields of land-locked Chad to a shipping facility off Cameroon's coast, was made possible by World Bank loans amounting to 337.6 million dollars.
Extensive research shows how the projects have undermined the rights and livelihoods of entire communities, and placed disproportionate burden on women, young girls, children and the youth. The authors chided the Bank and its investors for “pandering to the patriarchal tendencies of certain communities where their projects – especially resource-extraction projects – are implemented”.
Outlining a variety of legal advocacy and litigation strategies that may
be employed to demand corporate accountability and remedial action for the
project-affected communities and countries, Ms. Ohaeri educated participants on
the national, regional and international legal frameworks and foundations, including
the specific provisions that govern such complex initiatives. She further explained
how the accountability mechanisms, with emphasis on the African Human Rights
Systems and institutional grievance platforms at the national, regional and
international levels, especially the World Bank Independent Inspection Panel
work. Participants learned about the procedures for engaging those mechanisms,
the respective roles of stakeholders and the necessary steps for the launch of an
effective litigation campaign: beginning from the identification and selection
of plaintiffs, the framing of the issues using the human rights paradigm; the
selection of forum; compilation of legal evidence, seeking technical and
research support and amicus curiae interventions, including the effective use
of friendly settlement procedures.
From that discussion about applicable standards, mechanisms, and
procedures, she highlighted the different challenges that both communities and their
legal representative may face in a high-profile litigation of this nature,
using her experiences gained from nearly a decade of direct involvement and
engagement in several complex development initiatives involving oil multinationals,
Chinese Consortiums, state and federal governments in Nigeria and Africa.
As part of its
broader efforts to build support for human rights-centered responses to the prevalence
of development-based displacements and the accompanying social and economic
rights deprivations, SPACES FOR CHANGE will continue to interrogate the
rhetoric and empty promises such as “employment generation, infrastructural
development and fair compensation” of multi-billion dollar investments in
Africa, which the WAGP project represents.
No comments:
Post a Comment