By Yemi Onafuye
Succession is
important to me now as a young person, not because I am overly anxious to take
over power but rather because I increasingly grow concerned over what tomorrow
hold for this great nation, Nigeria. Who are the leaders of tomorrow? This is
something to worry about considering the fact that leadership has been the
undoing of Nigeria thus far. If we would not remain undone, our leaders have to
be different.
I once came across two schools of thought. The first opined that
leaders are born not made; the second stated that leaders are made not born. I
agreed with the latter since the characteristics that make a person a good
leader are learnt over time. Even if some of them are innate potentials, they
have to be developed before they can be of use to anybody. This means it is a
delusion to simply point at the youths once the question “who are the leaders
of tomorrow?” is asked, without taking into consideration the fact that
tomorrow’s leaders have to go through a making process, the result of which
would determine what sought of leaders they become.
The big
questions are ‘who are the present societal influences responsible for the
making of youths today?’ ‘Who are those that affect the minds and thinking of
the bulk of society’s young adults, adolescents and children?’ ‘Are these influences
positive or negative in relation to societal progress?’
Chimamanda
Adiche, a reputable writer and public speaker with marks in African Literature,
professes to have been influenced as a youth by Chinua Achebe, a legendary giant
in African literature. She read Chinua
Achebe’s Things Fall Apart at the age
of ten. John Maynard Keynes, a renowned American economist with great
contributions to economic thought that helped tackle the great depression of
1929, was as a young adult influenced by older economists like Alfred Marshall
and A.C Pigou. With these and many more examples we realize the sought of
greatness and immense societal benefit that influence can birth.
Future society
lies on the influences of future leaders today. If this be the case, then
someone sound the alarm because bulk of today’s youngsters draw inspiration
from entertainers. Seven out of every ten youngsters will prefer movie, sports,
fashion, celebrity and music channels to news or research channels. On the
internet, they browse mainly social networks, music download sites, fashion
sites and latest celebrity gossip. They flip to entertainment and sport
sections of newspapers and magazines, stamping other sections ‘boring’. All
these aside the fact that today’s youngsters wear earpieces most of the time,
connected to handheld and pocket-sized audio and video players. One would
wonder what time they have to think outside the entertainment box.
Entertainers
might not be ‘bad’ in themselves but the effect of their influence on the future
leaders is adverse to societal progress for a number of reasons.
First, due to
it’s ease and leisure perspective, entertainment in most of it’s forms helps
people relax. The excessive exposure of
youngsters to entertainment therefore, gives them a leisure orientation. They
are always ‘relaxing’. Sight is lost of such values as hard work and diligence
which are vital to a meaningful future society. This can be tagged ‘the influence of ease’.
Secondly, talent
seems to be more pronounced in the entertainment industry. Even though many
entertainers are highly educated, their talents such as their ability to sing,
dance, act or play a certain sport remarkably, always take centre stage while
their education and training stay backstage. Today, an increasing number of
youngsters ‘don’t like school’. They perceive education as unnecessary.
Everything has to be as fun as a television show. This is ‘the influence of talent is all you need’.
Quite a number
of entertainers are young, rich and famous. It is not fallacious to say
majority of them have done a lot of work in terms of time investment and
training to be who they are, but the influenced youngsters rarely see it that
way. They see young people like themselves who have made millions and are
famous for doing almost nothing. The outcome is a search for avenues to make
quick money and fame with little or no efforts thus ‘the influence of quick money, quick fame’.
With the level
of moral decadence amongst entertainers, one would double sound the alarm at
the thought of their being the major societal influences. Many entertainers are
closely associated with scandals and indecent behavior and this again reflects
in the lifestyle of their young followers who happen to be the leaders of
future society. ‘The influence of moral
decadence’ entails a morally bankrupt pack of future leaders which spells
d-o—o-m for any society.
Taking a shallow
look, one might think society has always been this way, but looking deeper
through history, it’s clear that the trend is new. Entertainers have not always
had the largest share in the influence market. In the past, scholars and
inventors had the largest share with most young people wanting to be educated.
Undoubtedly, the fact that entertainment today is made available via highly
convenient media has contributed immensely to the trend.
This is an
awareness call. I am sounding the alarm. If tomorrow’s leaders would be
anything worth hoping for, their making process has to be on the mind of
everyone today. Leaving this responsibility in the hands of entertainers is
like keeping a bone in custody of your dog.
During the last
Nigerian Presidential inauguration in May 2011, the President was recorded to
have said “The Nigeria of our dreams must be built on hard work and not on
short cuts”. I totally agree with the President, however, wrong influences on
tomorrow’s leaders has set them on the path of ‘shortcuts’, shortcuts to
nowhere, shortcuts that would mess up the Nigeria of our dreams. They have to
be set on the right path via right influences for a promising future to exist.
Who exactly holds the power to set things straight?
No comments:
Post a Comment