Eko Atlantic City (EAC), project attracted huge debate as experts
argue that it is not a popular idea and exclusively meant for
the rich. National Weekender's (a national daily newspaper in Nigeria) reporter FRANCIS OGBONNA took on all sides as he spoke to the
Commissioner for Waterfront Infrastructure Development, South Energy Nig. Ltd.(SENL)
and a human right advocate, Victoria Ibezim – Ohaeri, executive director of Spaces
for Change
The Project
Eko Atlantic City touted
severally as a “city rising from the sea” is a proposed city which will sit on
1000 hectares of land reclaimed from the Atlantic sea. Once completed, it will
be a self sufficient city with waterfront area, tree line streets, efficient
transport system, helipads, hotels, residential areas and boulevard. It will be
a development with mixed-use plots that will combine residential areas, leisure
facilities, offices and shops. It is divided into 6 phases, the first five of
which are available for commercial and residential development, while the sixth
will be used as a hub for utility service, such as sewage treatment plants,
water supply and solid waste management.
According to its developer, the city will help among other things decongest areas of Lagos; build on Lagos reputation as a “land of aquatic splendor; serve as tourist attraction; provide job opportunities as thousands of people will participate in the construction of the city and serve as headquarters for oil companies. It will also serve as resident for 250,000 inhabitants; work place for 150,000 workforces and see 250,000 persons commute on a daily basis. As a self sufficient city, it will generate its own power and fulfill its ICT needs because it will have installed extensive fibre optics equipment, all of these underground.
According to its developer, the city will help among other things decongest areas of Lagos; build on Lagos reputation as a “land of aquatic splendor; serve as tourist attraction; provide job opportunities as thousands of people will participate in the construction of the city and serve as headquarters for oil companies. It will also serve as resident for 250,000 inhabitants; work place for 150,000 workforces and see 250,000 persons commute on a daily basis. As a self sufficient city, it will generate its own power and fulfill its ICT needs because it will have installed extensive fibre optics equipment, all of these underground.
Uniqueness of the project
It is not
entirely a new concept. Before now, several cities have been constructed on
reclaimed lands, some out of necessity, and others purely out of man’s
insatiable desire to conquer nature. Modern reclamation work first began with Hong
Kong’s “Praya Reclamation” scheme which added 50 to 60 acres of land in 1890.
It was one of the most ambitious projects ever undertaken during the Colonial
Hong Kong Era. Since then, Hong Kong Disney Resort, Hong Kong International Airport
and its predecessor Kai Tak Airport, have all been built on reclaimed lands.
Other modern examples include
Helsinki, Finland, Mexico City; Foreshore of Cape Town; Chicago Shoreline;
Hassan II Mosque, Beirut; Central District, Lebanon more elaborate experiences
is the Dubai story. In July 2013, Sri Lanka signed a deal to build a $1.4
billion port city with Chinese Communication Construction Company which will
invest $1.43 billion to build this port city. In Nigeria, the first ambitious
project of similar nature, although not close in magnitude was the Banana
Island Project.
Layout and Protection Plan
These
proposed cities have the main reclaimed area, being 7.5km long, with a width of
2.3 km on the Western end, tapering to 0.5km on the Eastern end. Eko Atlantic
when completed will be one and have times the size of Victoria Island.
Beginning from the shores of bar beach. The boundaries will terminate just
before Goshen Estate in Lekki. The outer edge of the reclaimed land will be
protected from the sea by approximately 8km long rock revetment to provide
shoreline protection to the new land and to Victoria Island. According to Prince
Adesegun Oniru, the Honorable Commissioner for Waterfront Infrastructure Development,
Lagos State, “The great city wall of Lagos or sea wall will withstand the worst
Atlantic storm that could be expected in over 100 years”.
Project Update
The
reclamation work on the Bar Beach which began in 2008, currently has a total of
5,000,000 sq. meters or 500 hectares of land area already reclaimed and
dedicated by President Goodluck Jonathan. To achieve this, the contractors have
pumped about 400,000 tones of sand on a daily basis reclaimed from marine shelf
mixed with granites gotten from neighboring city of Abeokuta and ferried by
about 90 trucks, almost all of the plots meant for allocation have been
acquired.
Lagos State Interest
Until the
promoters were contacted, the question of actual ownership of the EAC project
has been unclear. Information available on different platforms varied. To some,
the project was solely a pet project of a particular political Godfather of
Yoruba extraction, while to some others; it was a joint venture between Lagos
State Government and SENL. Another set of opponents believed it was a LASG’s
project and that they just choose to front SENL. One of such opponents,
Professor Aradeon (An Arch – Educator in the chair of Build with Earth, an NGO)
as said “EACP is a private gated city firmly grounded on the exploitation and
expropriation and use of our common wealth for private profit”.
Responding
swiftly to that, David Frame, the MD of South EnergyX Engineering Limited debunked
these claims saying it was a strategic partnership with LASG, a concession
which gives exclusive authority over development of the city to SENL. In is
word “SENL has a concession agreement with LASG and the duration is 78 years.
The funding is through a consortium of local and international banks and also
incomes from sales”. Confirming this also the Prince Oniru, said “EAC is owned
by SENL. They are the sole owners of that project called Eko Atlantic City; the
role that the LASG is playing in this project is clearly a supervision role”.
However,
this does not mean that LASG has nothing to gain from this project. On the
contrary, the representative of LASG has without mincing words acknowledged
that they have a lot to gain from the execution, financially and other wise.
Chief among these games is a permanent solution provided to the incessant ocean
surge that easily beset Victoria Island and its environs. According to Oniru
“this project is the life-saver of Victoria Island”.
Financially,
apart from the fee usually paid for approval of construction, part of the
agreement signed with SENL will see LASG get from every land allotted, 5% the
value and another 5% as consent fees. This is not to mention the monies
accruable as land use tax on each building constructed and other applicable
taxes. As relayed by Oniru, “EAC falls within the territory of Lagos and like
every other part of the state, would not be granted any concession” when asked
about the possibility of the city enjoying any form of tax waiver.
Other
benefits include the city conferring on Lagos the title of being among the
prestigious list of cities built on water and will help among other things
decongest certain areas of Lagos.
Opposition and Defense
Opponents of
these projects have raised certain objections. These groups of organized
individuals and institutions ranging from experts, including Environmentalist;
Marine Engineers; Legal Practitioners to Human Rights Activists and
International NGOs have stated 3 main arguments: the promoters‘ defiance of
Conventions; insensitivities to possible negative impact on the neighboring
communities and the purely elitist nature of the project.
In August
2012, representatives of Heinrich Boll Stiftung; Nigerian Environmental Law
Research Institutes and Community Conservation and Development Initiative had
jointly presented a report and in it, alleged that LASG has violated the
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Act 2004 by summiting Eko Atlantic EIA
reports 3 years after the commencement of dredging activities (the EIA Act
2004, provides that an EIA must first be carried out before embarking on any
development project). In their words “LASG submitted on the report of the EIA
on November 2011, approval from Federal Ministry of Environment came January
2013, while reclamation started 2008”. Secondly, the final draft of the EIA
submitted was for Phase 1-Dredging stage and so did not cover construction
phase, however piling work for construction of the first building as started.
In defense,
David Frame had suggested that their action was necessitated by an urgent need
to salvage a dire situation. “The rapid erosion of the coastline of Lagos is
well documented. Along Bar Beach, Victoria Island in particular, the situation
was threatening the very existence of low lying Victoria Island with the
collapse of the Costal road, Ahmadu Bello Way in 2005/2006. Emergency action
was instigated by Lagos Government (LASG) to avert a pending disaster.
Subsequently violent storms could have devastated Victoria Island had the
protection not been installed. LASG later publicly justified their course of
action” he had said. Oniru on the other hand asserted that “nothing (no part of
the process) was fast-tracked. The numbers of Environmental Impact Assessment
were done by Royal Dutch Company, Royal Haskoning together with the Federal
Ministry of Environment. It is a continuous assessment, as the project
progresses more assessments will be done”.
As it
concerns transparency, these opponents opined in several fora that public
engagement was not part of LASG and SENL plans. They had claimed that the
several public hearings held by the promoters were not widely publicized and
when held, the demographics of the participants did not reflect the requisite
stake holders. Victoria Ibezim-Ohaeri,
Executive Director of Spaces for Change, an NGO in the forefront of the fight
for community participation in development had said about one of such public
hearings she attended, that “99% of the participants were government officials,
and hand-picked specifically for that purpose”.
Frame discredited
this statement saying it was “…completely incorrect. In fact the level of
public attendance was considerably greater”. Concerning the media used, he said
“the event was publicized by direct engagement with identified stakeholders in
the press and local radio has instructed by the FME”.
Last, but
not the least, a lot of people has wondered how much a plot of land cost in the
new peninsula. Frame had been quoted on one occasion as saying plots close to
the city waterfront would cost $2,000 (N320,000) per square meter, while inner
city cost $1,000 (N160,000) per square meter. If we were to go by the fact that
David Frame had on another occasion divulged that an average plot in the city
would not be measured by normal standard which is 1,000 square meters, but
2,500 to 3,000 square meters. Then an average plot on EAC will go for between $5,000,000
and $6,000,000 (N800, 000,000 and 960,000,000 respectively at N160 to a Dollar)
for waterfront plots and $2,500,000 and $3,000,000 (N400, 000,000 and N480,
000,000 correspondingly at N160 per Dollar) for inner city plots.
This has
been interpreted as being ridiculously high. In her words, Ibezim-Ohaeri had
described it as being “brazenly expensive…and 5 times more expensive than Ikoyi.
Your wealth has to be higher than normal for you to be able to afford one (a
plot)”.
The
promoters on the other hand are unapologetic about it, saying it was
competitive compared to other areas in Lagos of like demographics. According to
Frame, “…given the enhanced facilities available in EAC, these rates represent
good value… All countries with a thriving economy have a super high density and
costly commercial centre. Would you expect to find a low cost housing in the
centre of London or New York?” Oniru, in concord, classified EAC and other
similar development as economically viable area, saying “it should be…
No comments:
Post a Comment